The WSJ has a good article on how Google is supposedly gaming their search results to show Google sites over those of third parties. The article suggests “emphysema” as a good example where Google puts its own content ahead of more relevant searches.
Here is what I got when I ran that search on Google:

Google Games Search Results
The Google page show at the top of the list is not only less helpful than the Mayo Clinic and Wikipedia page that it beats, it is also a lower page ranked page with content that is less focused on the actual search term, “emphysema” and is more focused on COPD.
The Google Health page is also less useful, IMHO, than the Mayo Clinic page. After I read the first two paragraphs of the Mayo site I felt like I had a good grasp on what emphysema was, but it took me reading about half of the Google Health listing before I realized that it was actually on a page talking about emphysema. I think this is because the Google page is more focused on the term “COPD.”
I’m not a doctor… but I’d guess that COPD and emphysema are likely the same thing. But I’m pretty sure that if the Mayo Clinic put up a page on COPD it would not rank on the top for emphysema. So it doesn’t really seem fair that Google would promote a page that talks about a different term that the word that I searched for.
Actually, Google does have a little link just below the link to Google Health that goes to the Mayo Clinic’s COPD page, and after glancing at it seems that emphysema is a factor in causing COPD. But this leads to the question as to why Google is curating search results to something other than the actual search term? If I wanted to know about how emphysema leads to COPD wouldn’t I search for “emphysema and COPD”? And why didn’t I understand from the Google Health page that COPD is caused by emphysema – particularly when the very first sentence of the Mayo’s page made it really clear?
But here is the funny thing in my mind:
Google doesn’t have to game the system at all!!
Why doesn’t Google just SEO optimize their own pages? Wouldn’t that be cleaner? I mean, they publicly publish what the algorithm looks for in a page!
My company is now is a number of Google marketplaces, which are awesome ways for new customers to find our service. I specifically remember having a conversation with one of the product managers for one of these marketplaces about why they didn’t have certain basic SEO stuff in the listings that went into the marketplace (like search engine friendly URLs, for example). He point blank told me that he knew nothing about SEO and didn’t really think it was important! But do you know how awesome it would be for me to have my Google marketplace listings showing up high in Google searches? They are a great potential distribution channel, since people can pretty much check out right there…
Why would Google not build its own services to win at SEO by doing all the simple SEO things right like good URLs, titles and content? How hard would that be? And then would people complain as much when Google’s own services floated to the top of the search results?
So, my message to Google would be: SEO optimize your pages and get some great content on them – and you’ll naturally float to the top of the search results.